Some educators and administrators worry that AI-generated insights may not be accurate or could lead to misinterpretations of teaching effectiveness.
Educators and administrators worry about privacy risks when using AI-powered tools.
Educators and administrators express fear that AI will replace their roles, leading to job insecurity and resistance to adoption.
Educators who have a bad first experience with AI may be hesitant to use it again.
Educators and administrators worry about privacy risks when using AI-powered tools.
Educators and administrators express fear that AI will replace their roles, leading to job insecurity and resistance to adoption.
Educators who have a bad first experience with AI may be hesitant to use it again.
At DeLaSalle High School, educators were hesitant to rely on AI-generated feedback, expressing concerns about its accuracy—especially when applied to performance frameworks used in classroom observations and coaching. The uncertainty created hesitation around fully adopting Sibme’s AI-powered tools.
To address these concerns, school leadership shared testimonials from other schools that had successfully integrated AI into their coaching workflows. Sibme’s team also stepped in to provide targeted training, helping staff understand how the AI gathers and interprets data. They introduced methods to improve feedback accuracy, such as using high-quality audio and uploading relevant context alongside videos. Additionally, feedback from DeLaSalle educators was used to refine Sibme’s AI prompts, ensuring more precise and relevant insights.
As educators better understood how the technology worked—and how their input could enhance its performance—their trust in AI-driven feedback grew. What began as skepticism turned into confidence, allowing DeLaSalle to more fully embrace AI as a valuable tool for professional growth.