Some educators and administrators worry about privacy risks when using AI-powered tools, particularly around biometric data, student privacy, and video recordings. Misinformation or a lack of understanding about how Sibme AI processes and stores data can increase hesitation.
Educators and administrators worry that AI-generated insights may not be accurate or could lead to misinterpretations.
Educators and administrators express fear that AI will replace their roles, leading to job insecurity and resistance to adoption.
Educators who have a bad first experience with AI may be hesitant to use it again.
Educators and administrators worry that AI-generated insights may not be accurate or could lead to misinterpretations.
Educators and administrators express fear that AI will replace their roles, leading to job insecurity and resistance to adoption.
Educators who have a bad first experience with AI may be hesitant to use it again.
When several school districts began exploring Sibme’s AI-powered tools, a common thread of concern quickly emerged. Educators and administrators voiced unease about the use of video and biometric data — particularly around the idea of AI “capturing their likeness” and the potential for misuse. Others feared that implementing such technology might inadvertently violate student data privacy laws, including FERPA.
Recognizing the seriousness of these concerns, district leaders took action. They opened up direct conversations with Sibme to better understand the company’s security protocols and how those aligned with existing data privacy laws. To reinforce their efforts, some districts brought in their legal teams to help draft clear internal guidelines and shape the messaging used to communicate with staff and community members.
Sibme also provided support by sharing its AI FAQ page, which outlines how data is processed, encrypted, and secured. This transparency helped demystify the technology. In response to specific concerns about student privacy, the districts evaluated and discussed video blur features — a solution designed to obscure student faces in recordings when needed.
Sibme helped districts frame their approach by sharing examples of how schools were addressing privacy concerns in early AI adoption. These real-world conversations and shared insights offered practical guidance, showing that AI-related privacy challenges could be managed thoughtfully and in alignment with compliance expectations.
In the end, clear and proactive communication made all the difference. By addressing fears head-on and demonstrating concrete security measures, the districts were able to ease hesitation and build trust with educators. The experience reinforced an important lesson: when it comes to introducing AI in schools, transparency isn't just helpful — it's essential.
